Bible Contradictions #44: Does god help us?

Bible contradictions 44

I once worked with a retired Catholic priest. He told me, “God helps you. It may seem like he’s not there, but every once in a while, when you need it most, he reaches down and dips the tip of his finger in the water of your life, and from there you can see the ripples.” I must admit it’s a very poetic and beautiful metaphor. But I don’t buy it. Praying doesn’t do anything, and I’ve never seen evidence of supernatural events in my life. Studies have even shown that prayer has no positive impact. But what does the bible say? Does god help us when we need it?

I previously did a post on prayer contradictions in the bible, but this takes things a little further than that post.

There are four verses (each in the Old Testament*) that supports the claim that god helps us when we are in trouble. They can be found here, here, here, and here.

*In the New Testament Jesus doesn’t really teach that god will help people. He’s more concerned with people following him.

But there are also several cases where god has not intervened on behalf of people who are in trouble and plea for his help. God fails to deliver from enemies. He fails to deliver from suffering and hostility. He refuses to stop people from being enslaved. He refuses to rescue peasants from Judah’s wickedness. He hides himself from people being robbed. He refuses to pardon children for their parents’ sins, even when they pray for it (or great, great grandparents’ sins). He won’t save people from violence and destruction. And finally, he withdraws from those who seek him out.

Judging from the entire span of human recorded observation, if god exists it’s much more likely that he falls into the latter category of not giving a shit. I wouldn’t put your money on god in times of need. Even if you seek him out he’s not going to listen, and even worse he’ll probably withdraw from you. The good news is that if he’s not going to help, that gives us more of a reason to get off our asses and do things ourselves.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Allah’s arsenal against devils: The Quran thinks stars are missiles

I’ve already written about the bible not understanding what stars are, so I’m not going to harp on that. This is a post to highlight the hilarious scientific ignorance about stars in the Quran. Behold:

And We have certainly beautified the nearest heaven with stars and have made [from] them what is thrown at the devils and have prepared for them the punishment of the Blaze. – Surat Al-Mulk 67:5

Get that? Let’s analyze this verse. First, the verse makes reference to the “nearest heaven” (in Islam there are seven heavens, not just one). But that’s not the funny part. Next the verse claims that stars are missiles that Allah uses to launch attacks against devils. Read the verse again. You’ll see what I mean. How does Allah punish devils? He plucks a star from the heavens, loads it into a rocket launcher, aims it at his nemesis, and blows him to Kingdom Come.

I can imagine some 7th century Islamic scholar looking up at the sky at night, seeing a shooting star, and saying, “There goes Allah killing devils!” Of course, shooting stars aren’t actually stars.

The Quran doesn’t stop there. Shall we read on?

And that we sought to reach heaven, but we found it filled with strong guards and flaming stars. – Surat Al-Jinn 72:8

Silly, silly Quran! You might’ve tried to reach heaven, but you weren’t prevented by powerful guards and flaming stars (“flaming stars?!!). You were prevented because your technology had not yet enabled you to reach the earth’s escape velocity. And even if you could, you’d still have to contend with an environment that doesn’t correlate well with life. Furthermore, we’ve been to space. And there are no powerful guards up there. And space is relatively void. The odds of running into something that can burn you are astronomically remote.

By now I hope that people who take the Quran seriously will realize the Quran is scientifically illiterate and ignorant. It got wrong the nature of the universe’s celestial bodies. If the Quran gets this wrong, what else might it get wrong?

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Study: Religious children more likely to believe fantasy than non-religious children

A recent study published in Cognitive Science this month reveals an interesting divide between children raised in secular homes and children raised in religious homes. The article, titled “Judgments About Fact and Fiction by Children From Religious and Nonreligious Backgrounds,” finds a correlation between religious upbringing and acceptance of impossible claims. Here is an excerpt from the abstract:

Children who went to church or were enrolled in a parochial school, or both, judged the protagonist in religious stories to be a real person, whereas secular children with no such exposure to religion judged the protagonist in religious stories to be fictional. Children’s upbringing was also related to their judgment about the protagonist in fantastical stories that included ordinarily impossible events whether brought about by magic … or without reference to magic … Secular children were more likely than religious children to judge the protagonist in such fantastical stories to be fictional. The results suggest that exposure to religious ideas has a powerful impact on children’s differentiation between reality and fiction, not just for religious stories but also for fantastical stories.

I’ve quoted the abstract because it perfectly sums up the findings in the study. As always, feel free to send me hate mail to request a copy of the full article (for legal reasons I can’t share the pdf file here).

While both religious children and non-religious children did a good job in the study of correctly identifying fictional characters, such as Snow White, religious children had a more difficult time than non-religious children correctly identifying stories with talking animals or supernatural beings (e.g. “giants, fairies”) as fictional.

Here’s the breakdown of the children (image borrowed without permission from the study and remains copyright of publisher and authors):

Corriveau study2

In this image, we can see that both religious and non-religious children fared roughly equally well in correctly identifying realistic stories. But secular children attending public schools were much, much more likely to identify stories with religious tones as being not real. And they were at least 50% more likely than religious children to identify fantasy stories as being not real. Religious children were less able to distinguish reality from fantasy.

And to underline the statistical significance of this study, here are the findings. Note that the “No Magic” categories include supernatural events, such as the parting of the sea or the parting of a mountain. The “Magic” or “No Magic” merely distinguishes between stories where the children were told it was a magical event and stories where the children were not told it was a magical event.

Holy shit look at that P-value!

Holy shit look at that ***P-value!

To me, this study underscores the intellectual danger associated with teaching our children biblical stories. We need to arm our children with the right tools to help them reach their potential intellectually. Religious teachings do not help them reach this potential. In fact, based on the findings of this study, I would expect that religious instruction actually hinders children from reaching their intellectual potential. In this case we can say that teaching your children religious stories is not responsible parenting.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 53 Comments

Bible Contradictions #43: Does sacrificing an animal take away sins?

Bible contradictions 43

Animal sacrifices are widespread in the bible, dating all the way back to when god ordered Adam and Eve to kill an animal to make the first leopard print pimp suit and hooker pants. Sometimes it’s done out of sheer religious idiocy, as if god really gets pleasure from the flesh of dead animals. Sometimes animals are slaughtered merely to test god, in some macho my-god-is-bigger-than-your-god challenge. Other times bible figures sliced the necks of animals because they actually believed doing so would cleanse them of their sins. Even biblically this is stupid, because all cases of animal sacrifice for atonement take place in the Old Testament, before atonement actually meant anything. Death is death in the OT. It wasn’t until Jesus’ time that atonement made death something else. But when we look to the OT, what does it actually say about animal sacrifice?

Sometimes slaughtering an animal takes your sins away, as we can see in Leviticus 4:20, 26, 31, 35Leviticus 5:10, 16, 18Leviticus 17:11Numbers 15:27-28, and Numbers 29:5.

But then the New Testament comes along, and Paul (or some other unnamed author) called all the Hebrews idiots for doing what the bible tells them to do. In Hebrews 10:4, 11 Paul is quite reasonable when he says “it is impossible” for animal sacrifices to have any impact on your soul. This is one of the few times I agree with Paul.

Posted in Atheism, Bible Contradictions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 55 Comments

Small gospel churches and cults, murderous cults

A walk down Colley Avenue in Ghent will find you face to face with an old gothic-esque stone Lutheran church. Ignore it. The pubs are less than a block away. Another twenty blocks along Colley and things have certainly changed. No more pubs. No outside eateries. No old single-screen movie theaters. We have the reverse of Ghent. Here we have church after church after church. Sometimes they’re difficult to see, nestled between a seasonal tax firm and a barber shop, no marquis, just a window sign announcing services. But they are always easy to find. Just follow the music! It sounds just like this:

Across the street from these small gospel churches sits a moderately large mosque. Sometimes outside on sunny days the Muslim men sell their wares, and I’ll often stop by to see if I can find a good deal. But my attention is always pulled to that gigantic soulful music coming from that tiny church. It’s impossible to ignore, and it fills the neighborhood. I start clapping my hands and humming along to the tune. Sometimes I’ll even cross the street and go inside.

These are black churches, and I stick out with my cowboy hat and colorful tattoos, but they never shun me away. I’ll raise my hands in the air, dance, hug the women wearing funny peach colored hats, and sing praise to Jesus. Of course, I don’t believe any of it. That’s what separates me from the church. I’m there only for the music, the dance, and the human interaction. The lyrics are meaningless. My praise is merely to keep the cadence. I face no threat of being pulled into something that could potentially destroy my life.

In case you didn’t notice, the above Youtube video is of the Peoples Temple Choir, the stars of Jim Jones’ show in northern California, and the band that followed him to Jonestown, Guyana. They probably all died on November 18, 1978. About 920 people committed suicide in Jonestown. Of everyone present that day, only 35 survived.

One survivor was Deborah Layton, who had this to say:

Nobody joins a cult. Nobody joins something they think is going to hurt them. You join a religious organization, you join a political movement, and you join with people that you really like.

deborah layton2

When I’m in those churches along Colley Ave, I can’t help but see them in a cultish light. Although these churches have never been accused of sexual misconduct or criminal brainwashing, I can see the allure of a thumping gospel band flanked by charismatic leaders and an even more charismatic, finely dressed preacher, preaching about god and political and social issues.

The people who go to these churches want a family more than they want a sermon. Can we imagine a scenario where a young man takes control of the pulpit in one of these Colley Ave churches and asks his parishioners to sell their belongings and move into his compound? He’ll pay for your medical care. He’ll take care of your food. Anything you need, you’ll receive. All he asks for in return is total devotion to the church and to him.

This will probably never happen in these Colley Ave churches. I’m not making a slippery slope argument. I’m merely saying there are already similarities between these small gospel churches and Jim Jones’ religious movement. It’s possible — albeit highly unlikely — that some of these churches could suffer the same fate as the Peoples Temple. “Nobody joins a cult … You join a religious organization.” There’s a fine line between them sometimes.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Does porn cause brain damage? Christian neurosurgeon fails at science

Everyone who knows me knows I’m a stickler for intellectual honesty. So when I came across this news article from a Christian news group, Today Christian, that claims, “A research study published in the latest Journal of American Medical Association: Psychiatry concludes that the more pornography a person watches, the less gray matter, connectivity and activity they have in their brain” (emphasis mine), I went ballistic. Usually I’d write a long diatribe and post it here, but so dishonest was their reporting that I decided it warranted a Youtube video instead. Enjoy!

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The road to my exorcism (Part 1)

As some of you might remember from a post I made a week ago, Dr. “Chaps” Gordon Klingenschmitt recently said atheists should be exorcised so they’ll feel “free to enjoy the worship of Jesus Christ.” I retorted back with my post, saying, essentially, “Prove it. Exorcise me and see how I feel about Christianity afterwards.” After I made the post, I sent Dr. Chaps an email, basically saying the same thing. He replied that he’d take me up on my offer and exorcise me if I watched all 17 training videos he’s made on how to be a good Christian. I accepted his counter offer. Here’s the initial email I sent and his response:

klingenschmitt copy

Of course, I’m aware that Dr. Chaps might be pulling my leg. Maybe he’s making me jump through all of these hoops because he doesn’t think I’ll actually do it.

Well, today I started doing it, beginning my journey towards exorcism. Even if he doesn’t live up to his end of the bargain, I’m sure I can find someone to exorcise me. Today I watched the first half-hour segment of his training series, taking notes and filming my reactions to his sermon. I don’t recommend watching it unless you’re really interested in what he has to say, but here is the video link.

In the video he teaches how to “discern spirits,” both good spirits (the Holy Spirit and angels) and bad spirits (demons), as well as the human spirit. He says something that made me chuckle about how to tell the difference between good and bad spirits: What are the voices inside your head telling you to do?

In other words, give into whatever mental illness you have and try to make rational choices regarding morality. I should also add that I thought religious people believed morality was biblically objective, but that’s neither here nor there.

Anyway, I’m not going to dwell on his sermon. I’ll critique the entire thing when I’ve seen all 17 episodes (quite possibly in a Youtube video).

I’ve shared this idea with a lot of people, and there seems to be some kind of ball rolling. Several people want to help me make a documentary of my journey to exorcism, the exorcism itself, and my response to the exorcism. Therefore, this post reflects my first step in this project. I’m not sure how many parts this blog series will have, but it should be rather lengthy. I’ll end each one by using Richard Dawkins’ theism/atheism scale and position myself somewhere on it.

dawkins-scale

Before watching Klingenschmitt’s video I was somewhere between a 6 and a 6.5. My position has not changed, even after watching his video. And I don’t expect it to.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

How to destroy friendships: This woman uses Jesus

Yesterday I read one of the most frustrating blog posts I’ve ever come across. The post is titled “Saying Goodbye To Friends Who Reject Jesus,” and it’s filled to the brim with vitriolic rejection of people who merely have differing opinions about god than the author. Let me be clear: She’s not merely saying that she rejects people who don’t believe in god, she’s turning her back on friendships that date back to her childhood because they live lifestyles with which she disagrees (I’m not exactly sure what those lifestyles are).

She writes:

Your non-Christian friends may say they believe in God, but reject Him with their lifestyles, or have set up their own false god, one who is okay with sin. And to stay friends with people who continue to deny their need of repentance and salvation from sin, is to deny and disobey Christ.

She then quotes a bunch of bible verses, including 2 John 1:10-11, which tells Christians to deny anyone who doesn’t live by Jesus. She finishes her post like this:

Sometimes, there are people in our lives we were once very close to that we have to say goodbye to now for Jesus. To stay friends with someone who continues to reject Him is to befriend an enemy of His.

I immediately replied that I thought this was a horrible message. She replied with a metaphor about whether or not we should be friends with people who hate our spouses. To this another user — quite possibly a Christian, but he never identified himself as one — replied with the following:

To you analogy: OK, so I’ll pretend someone hates my wife. Let’s call her Sarah. Would I want Sarah in my life? Probably not. But what if my wife was perfectly patient and kind and loving, and what if she desperately wanted to be in Sarah’s life because she wants to save her from eternal suffering? Well, then I’d do everything I could for Sarah! I would just casually tell her good things about my wife and live a good life in hopes that Sarah’s curiosity would eventually peak. I wouldn’t reject Sarah out of petty, protective loyalty unless she stood to do my wife harm.

Beautiful.

This post underscores the dangers of religious thinking. This is intolerance at best, hatred at worst. This is precisely the kind of thinking that leads to mothers and fathers kicking their unbelieving children to the streets. This is precisely the kind of thinking that destroys families and friendships (which it did in this case). And this is precisely the kind of thinking that leads to people picketing funerals. She hasn’t gotten that far yet, and I hope she won’t. But this is just awful.

To make matters worse, a young woman also commented on the post, “Looking back I encourage every believer to cut off friends that obviously disregard God.” In other words, this could be systemic rather than an isolated case of intolerance.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , | 27 Comments

The Atheist Papers facebook page

Wow! Four posts in one day! It’s the summer, and I have more time on my hands. I’ve been keeping as busy as possible, which means reading, analyzing, and critiquing materials. And I have more time to blog (I also have a queue of tens of future blog posts, but I won’t inundate you with those). This will be my last post of the day, I swear.

This post is merely to announce that I’ve created a Facebook page because lately I’ve been receiving an abnormally large number of death threats, thanks in part to Saudi Arabia unblocking this page and the Muslim world sharing one of my posts that are more critical of Islam. It’s also due to the link I added to my page titled “Send me hate mail.” I don’t take any of these threats seriously, so I won’t discuss them right now. (There’s a future blog post for that).

But all of this attention — my web traffic has increased by a factor of four in the last few days, and most of that is in the Muslim world — I wanted to make myself a little more interactive. I’ve created a Facebook page for this blog, where I will be considerably more active. I’ll get around to the other social networks soon. But if you wish to follow me and help spread the Good News of reason, feel free to like my page: The Atheist Papers.

logo1

Besides, it’s social media that is slowly bringing about the death of all gods.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

The most important source in the evolution/creation debate: Peer-reviewed evidence of speciation

In the evolution/creation “debate” (it’s not much of a debate if you ask me) a common fallacious talking point among creationists/intelligent design advocates is that no one has ever observed one species turning into another species, a process called speciation. Most people on the side of science correctly retort that evolution is a long process. But we needn’t even make this claim because the “no-speciation” claim by creationists is utterly false.

There have been hundreds of observed instances of speciation, and many have been documented in peer-reviewed scientific journals. There is a website — probably the most important web source for data on this topic — that lists 89 peer-reviewed articles showing instances of one species turning into another species. The author of this site claims to also have another 115 articles to add to the list.

The website is here.

I’ve gone through several of the articles, examined their methodology and accept their findings. I hope that after you show your creationist friends this evidence that they will soften to the fact of evolution. If you don’t have access to these journal articles and would like me to send you a pdf of a particular article, please click the link at the top of my page that says “Send me hate mail” and include the bibliographic information for that particular article, found at the bottom of the website in the link I’ve provided. Please copy it verbatim and post it into the message to ensure that I have the correct information. Please note that I have access to most academic journals but not all of them. I’ll do my best to find it.

Posted in Atheism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments